HOME | STAFF
|
STRATEGIC PLAN |
ASSESSMENT PLAN |
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN, FY 2004-05
| I. |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
| |
|
1.
Support Teaching and Learning
2. Support Research
3. Support and Enhance the Functionality of
Administrative, Business, Financial, Human Resources, and
Student Information Systems
4. Enhance Hardware and Software
Infrastructure and IT Communications and Productivity Tools
5. Improve Information Technology
Organization, Planning, and Communications
6. Engage USC's 4-year and Regional Campuses
7. Engage in Outreach |
| II. |
ANNUAL REPORT FOR YEARS 2003 - 2004 |
| |
|
A. Strategic
Goal Progress
B. Modification of Goals |
|
|
| III. |
STRATEGIC PLAN |
| |
|
1.
Support Teaching and Learning
2. Support Research
3. Support and Enhance the Functionality of
Administrative, Business, Financial, Human Resources, and
Student Information Systems
4. Enhance Hardware and Software
Infrastructure and IT Communications and Productivity Tools
5. Improve Information Technology
Organization, Planning, and Communications
6. Engage USC's 4-year and Regional Campuses
7. Engage in Outreach |
| IV. |
RESOURCE
REQUIREMENTS |
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The strategic goals (and objectives) of our UNIT for the next
5 years are as follows:
- Support Teaching and Learning
- Meet the goals and objectives listed in USC's Strategic
and Assessment Plan for Distance and Distributed Learning.
See
www.it.sc.edu/oit/docs/eLearningstrategicplan.pdf
- Create a Teaching and Learning Center to support faculty
and teaching assistants in efforts to improve instructional
quality.
- Review Blackboard performance and assess USC's other course
management system options.
- Assist the Library in selection and implementation of
a new Integrated Library System (ILS) as part of the statewide
PASCAL consortium.
- Support Research
- In partnership with the Office of Research and Health Sciences,
convene a faculty group to review the computational needs of
USC and make recommendations regarding high-performance computing
direction and support.
- Conduct an inventory of applications requiring HPC resources
for modeling, simulation, or other data-intensive needs.
- Review existing computational and visualization efforts on
campus to determine if and how any of these activities may form
the core of a new, centrally-supported research computing initiative.
- Remain active and engaged in SURA, especially those activities
related to computing and data grids, high bandwidth regional
networking, high performance computing, and the SURA Coastal
Ocean Observing Program (SCOOP).
- Support the needs of the emerging USC Research Campus.
- Support and Enhance the Functionality of Administrative,
Business, Financial, Human Resources, and Student Information
Systems
- Plan and launch an ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) project
to replace legacy financial, human resources, and student information
systems.
- Add functionality to the Data Warehouse.
- Enhance Hardware and Software Infrastructure and IT Communications
and Productivity Tools
- Increase wireless data communications coverage from 40% of
the campus to 90% of the campus.
- Review USC's enterprise email and electronic calendaring options
to better serve faculty, student, and staff needs.
- Complete the Web Presence transformation and develop "virtual
tour" capabilities.
- Review, price, and recommend Web content management solutions.
- Review USC's enterprise IM (instant messaging) options.
- Release a cellular telephone RFP to reduce costs and improve
functionality for USC cellular technology users.
- Activate current phone switch capabilities to integrate with
cellular telephones, voice mail, text messaging, and email.
- Develop a three-year rolling plan for infrastructure renewal,
upgrades, expansion, and replacement.
- Improve Information Technology Organization, Planning, and
Communications
- Integrate Distance Education and Instructional Support (DEIS)
and Computer Services (CS) into a single organization.
- Establish formal planning and communications functions in
the Office of Information Technology.
- Re-charter the University Information Technology Council (UITC)
and reevaluate membership and unit representation.
- Improve coordination of centralized and decentralized (unit
controlled) IT activities.
- Improve coordination and accuracy of Web-based information
about IT activities, capabilities, and services.
- Develop a transparent, highly visible, and easily understood
method for establishing and periodically reviewing priorities
for IT resource allocation.
- Engage USC's 4-year and Regional Campuses
- Meet with 4-year campus CIOs and Regional Campus IT representative
at least four times yearly.
- Complete the Palmetto College IT infrastructure and support
the launch of that initiative.
- Meet with each Chancellor and Regional Campus Dean at least
once per semester to ensure alignment with campus objectives.
- Ensure engagement of 4-year and Regional Campuses in review
of enterprise options such as ERP and course management systems.
- Engage in Outreach
- Continue to work closely with the City of Columbia and local
business interests to extend broadband communications access
to all citizens in the Columbia metropolitan area.
- Enhance USC's regional and national IT profile through active
and high
- visibility participation in organizations such as EDUCAUSE.
- Continue to act as an information resource for the Legislative,
Judicial, and Executive branches of state government.
- Serve as a point of coordination on IT issues that affect
South Carolina higher education.
- Improve means of communication and ease of access to USC's
eLearning environment for students at a distance.
Previous Year's Accomplishments:
The previous year's accomplishments may be found at the
Office of Information Technology web site.
Statement of Participation:
Draft copies of this Strategic Plan were reviewed by the
management teams of Computer Services and Distance Education
and Instructional Support, and by members of the University IT
Council. Feedback from these sources was incorporated into the
final document. GO BACK
TO TOP
- ANNUAL REPORT FOR YEARS 2003 - 2004
The Office of Information Technology did not submit a
formal strategic plan for 2003-2004.
- Strategic Goal Progress
- To review the annual report of accomplishments from Computer
Services, please see
www.csd.sc.edu/Administration/2003_Accomplishments.pdf
- Objective: None stated.
Assessment Criteria: n/a
Results/Progress: n/a
Use of Assessment Results: n/a
- Modification of Goals
See Section III, Strategic Plan, for baseline
information
GO BACK TO TOP
- STRATEGIC PLAN
The Office of Information Technology has identified the
following objectives for 2004-2005 in support of the strategic
goals:
- Support Teaching and Learning
- Objective: Meet the goals and objectives listed
in USC's Strategic and Assessment Plan for Distance and
Distributed Learning. See
www.it.sc.edu/oit/docs/eLearningstrategicplan.pdf
Assessment Strategies: Strategies are included in the
plan cited above.
Assessment Criteria: Assessment criteria are included
in the plan cited above.
Assessment Methods: Assessment methods are included
in the plan cited above. - Objective: Create a
Teaching and Learning Center to support faculty and teaching
assistants in efforts to improve instructional quality.
Assessment Strategies: 1. The Office of IT will
commit the time of two faculty Directors to establish clear
objectives and develop a plan to expand the Teaching and
Learning Center (TLC) concept.
2. The Office of IT will work with the Office of the Provost
and the Dean of Libraries to identify suitable space for a
TLC.
3. The faculty Directors will survey or sample faculty to
help determine the types of assistance that will be most
likely to be used by faculty. This information will be used
to help design a "virtual" TLC to complement the physical
TLC.
Assessment Criteria: 1. The Office of IT will work
with the Office of the Provost to ensure that highly
qualified and capable faculty are identified.
2. The University IT Council will review location and plans
to ensure that the space identified is suitable for the
intended purposes.
3. The Office of IT will monitor the design and use of the
TLC web site.
Assessment Methods: 1. The accomplishments of the
faculty Directors will be reviewed annually by the Office of
IT and the Office of the Provost.
2. The UITC will develop a checklist and note needed
improvements.
3. TLC web site monitoring will take place monthly and data
regarding page accesses will be used to reconfigure links to
better meet faculty needs. A feedback mechanism will be
provided for web site visitors. - Objective:
Review Blackboard performance and assess USC's other course
management system options.
Assessment Strategies: Convene a user group to elicit
feedback on system positives and negatives; survey industry
trends; look for best practices in higher education.
Assessment Criteria: Answer the question, "Is
Blackboard the optimal course management system for USC?"
Assessment Methods: CMS instructional support staff
will seek qualitative and quantitative feedback from users,
will examine the options by scanning best practices and
industry trends, and will present findings to UITC for
consideration and a recommendation to the CIO. -
Objective: Review Blackboard performance and assess
USC's other course management system options.
Assessment Strategies: Convene a user group to elicit
feedback on system positives and negatives; survey industry
trends; look for best practices in higher education.
Assessment Criteria: Answer the question, "Is
Blackboard the optimal course management system for USC?"
Assessment Methods: CMS instructional support staff
will seek qualitative and quantitative feedback from users,
will examine the options by scanning best practices and
industry trends, and will present findings to UITC for
consideration and a recommendation to the CIO.
- Support Research
- Objective: In partnership with the Office of Research and Health
Sciences, convene a faculty group to review the computational needs of USC and
make recommendations regarding high-performance computing direction and
support.
Assessment Strategies: Call the meeting, facilitate discussion, and
gather qualitative data.
Assessment Criteria: Did substantive action items emerge from the
discussion?
Assessment Methods: In conjunction with the Offices of the Provost and
VP for Research and Health Sciences, determine how to use information from
faculty to shape USC research computing strategies. - Objective:
Conduct an inventory of applications requiring HPC resources for modeling,
simulation, or other data-intensive needs.
Assessment Strategies: Assign OIT grad asst to inventory applications
in summer 2004.
Assessment Criteria: Is the inventory comprehensive?
Assessment Methods: Post results on the web and seek feedback from
faculty researchers regarding comprehensiveness. - Objective:
Review existing computational and visualization efforts on campus to determine
if and how any of these activities may form the core of a new,
centrally-supported research computing initiative.
Assessment Strategies: Establish dialogue with faculty research
community about economies of scale for some research computing support
services.
Assessment Criteria: Would consolidation and/or collaboration around
some research computing activities lead to resource savings and efficiencies
for researchers?
Assessment Methods: Analyze budgets and cost of services on a per unit
basis. - Objective: Remain active and engaged in SURA,
especially those activities related to computing and data grids, high
bandwidth regional networking, high performance computing, and the SURA
Coastal Ocean Observing Program (SCOOP).
Assessment Strategies: CIO or designee(s) will attend meetings, engage
in SURA activities.
Assessment Criteria: Does SURA engagement help USC's research efforts?
Assessment Methods: seek feedback from leaders of SCOOP initiative at USC. -
Objective: Support the needs of the emerging USC Research Campus.
Assessment Strategies: Remain aligned with Offices of Research and
Health Sciences, Provost, and President.
Assessment Criteria: Does Division of IT have resources that may help
realize the research campus vision?
Assessment Methods: Monitor level of engagement.
- Support and Enhance the Functionality of Administrative, Business,
Financial, Human Resources, and Student Information Systems
- Objective: Plan and launch an ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning)
project to replace legacy financial, human resources, and student information
systems.
Assessment Strategies: Make the case for USC to provide first year project
funding.
Assessment Criteria: Is the funding granted at a level sufficient to
begin staffing, business office process assessment and redesign, and intensive
project planning?
Assessment Methods: ERP project leader will establish comprehensive
project plan and map allocation against needed expenditures. -
Objective: Add functionality to the Data Warehouse.
Assessment Strategies: Computer Services will work with end users to
define and add functionality as required.
Assessment Criteria: Determine whether additional functionality meets
user needs.
Assessment Methods: Iterative discussions with users.
- Enhance Hardware and Software Infrastructure and IT Communications and
Productivity Tools
- Objective: Increase wireless data communications coverage from
40% of the campus to 90% of the campus.
Assessment Strategies: Contract with external providers to map the
campus in quadrants. Implement quadrants 1 and 2 during the fall semester,
followed by quadrants 3 and 4 at the beginning of the spring semester.
Assessment Criteria: Is the job completed according to specs and do
end users enjoy a seamless, wireless network over the entire campus.
Assessment Methods: Check for uniform signal strength throughout the
campus, determine whether users are able to maintain network connectivity in
all locations. - Objective: Review USC's enterprise email and
electronic calendaring options to better serve faculty, student, and staff
needs.
Assessment Strategies: Form working group to examine email migration
paths. Establish a project based on their recommendations.
Assessment Criteria: Is migration to a new, ubiquitous email and
calendaring platform completed?
Assessment Methods: Survey of customers to determine satisfaction
with new functionality. - Objective: Complete the Web Presence
transformation and develop "virtual tour" capabilities.
Assessment Strategies: Work with Office of Advancement, Office of
Student Affairs to determine requirements.
Assessment Criteria: To be determined by Office of Advancement and
Office of Student Affairs.
Assessment Methods: To be determined by Office of Advancement and
Office of Student Affairs. - Objective: Review, price, and
recommend Web content management solutions.
Assessment Strategies: Develop a web content management RFI in
cooperation with the Office of Advancement.
Assessment Criteria: To be determined by the Office of Advancement.
Assessment Methods: To be determined by the Office of Advancement. -
Objective: Review USC's enterprise IM (instant messaging) options.
Assessment Strategies: Initiate a project team to investigate
options.
Assessment Criteria: Has the team been formed and produced
recommendations.
Assessment Methods: To be determined. - Objective:
Release a cellular telephone RFP to reduce costs and improve functionality
for USC cellular technology users.
Assessment Strategies: Work with Offices of Housing and Residence
Life to define student cellular needs.
Assessment Criteria: Is an RFI developed that elicits useful vendor
responses?
Assessment Methods: Determine whether there are viable vendor
proposals that aid USC students. - Objective: Activate current
phone switch capabilities to integrate with cellular telephones, voice mail,
text messaging, and email.
Assessment Strategies: Review Avaya switch options, introduce them to
the campus.
Assessment Criteria: Are the additional services made available?
Assessment Methods: Determine utilization statistics for new features
on a regular basis. - Objective: Develop a three-year rolling
plan for infrastructure renewal, upgrades, expansion, and replacement.
Assessment Strategies: Ask Lorie Edwards and Susan Bridwell to
develop a joint plan for the division.
Assessment Criteria: Is the plan completed?
Assessment Methods: Determine whether the plan meets campus needs by
sharing it with interested USC parties.
- Improve Information Technology Organization, Planning, and Communications
- Objective: Integrate Distance Education and Instructional Support
(DEIS) and Computer Services (CS) into a single organization.
Assessment Strategies: Execute organizational mergers and staff
relocations where appropriate. Choose a new name.
Assessment Criteria: Is the merger effected?
Assessment Methods: Monitor service improvements and budget
efficiencies in the affected areas. - Objective: Establish
formal planning and communications functions in the Office of Information
Technology.
Assessment Strategies: Work with public relations staff of CS to expand
focus to broader campus issues.
Assessment Criteria: Are we keeping students, staff, and faculty
informed of new initiative and services?
Assessment Methods: Survey user population. - Objective:
Re-charter the University Information Technology Council (UITC) and reevaluate
membership and unit representation.
Assessment Strategies: Ask UITC for assistance in improving the
information exchange and participatory functions of the Council.
Assessment Criteria: Is UITC dialogue improved?
Assessment Methods: Surevey the members. - Objective:
Improve coordination of centralized and decentralized (unit controlled) IT
activities.
Assessment Strategies: Schedule a campus-wide meeting of all IT
personnel. Seek feedback on how to improve coordination and communication.
Assessment Criteria: Are there communications and coordination criteria
that emerge from the meeting?
Assessment Methods: Schedule followup meetings with IT personnel to
seek additional recommendations for refinement. - Objective:
Improve coordination and accuracy of Web-based information about IT
activities, capabilities, and services.
Assessment Strategies: Assign Office of IT staff to monitor and refresh
the web site on a regular basis.
Assessment Criteria: Is the information more comprehensive and timely?
Assessment Methods: Seek user feedback. - Objective:
Develop a transparent, highly visible, and easily understood method for
establishing and periodically reviewing priorities for IT resource allocation.
Assessment Strategies: Ensure that the CS project database is widely
visible. Clarify the processes associated with additions to the database.
Assessment Criteria: Is there more engagement on the part of USC users?
Assessment Methods: Monitor DB utilization and genesis of projects
added.
- Engage USC's 4-year and Regional Campuses
- Objective: Meet with 4-year campus CIOs and Regional Campus IT
representative at least four times yearly.
Assessment Strategies: Schedule quarterly meetings.
Assessment Criteria: Did the meetings occur?
Assessment Methods: Are the participants more informed about each
other's activities? - Objective: Complete the Palmetto College
IT infrastructure and support the launch of that initiative.
Assessment Strategies: Coordinate activities with the Office of the
Vice Provost for Regional Campuses and Continuing Education as he leads the
rollout of Palmetto College.
Assessment Criteria: Are the technical resources in place to ensure
Palmetto College's success in that regard?
Assessment Methods: Iterative conversations with Dr. Plyler, Deans of
the Regional Campuses. - Objective: Meet with each Chancellor
and Regional Campus Dean at least once per semester to ensure alignment with
campus objectives.
Assessment Strategies: Schedule the meetings.
Assessment Criteria: Did the meetings occur?
Assessment Methods: Iterative conversations with Dr. Plyler, Regional
Campus Deans. - Objective: Ensure engagement of 4-year and
Regional Campuses in review of enterprise options such as ERP and course
management systems.
Assessment Strategies: Communicate with Dr. Plyler and Deans of
Regional Campuses about opportunities for participation in reviews.
Assessment Criteria: Do Regional Campuses have a voice at the table for
discussions of important IT initiatives?
Assessment Methods: Iterative meetings with Dr. Plyler, Deans.
- Engage in Outreach
- Objective: Continue to work closely with
the City of Columbia and local business interests to extend broadband
communications access to all citizens in the Columbia metropolitan area.
Assessment Strategies: Determine whether this objective is legally,
politically, and financially feasible.
Assessment Criteria: Is it possible to move forward on this objective?
Assessment Methods: Meetings with city, regional, and state leaders to
determine feasibility. - Objective: Enhance USC's regional and
national IT profile through active and high-visibility participation in
organizations such as EDUCAUSE.
Assessment Strategies: Attend meetings, communicate with other IT
leaders, volunteer for participation on relevant task forces and committees.
Assessment Criteria: Does the level of USC engagements with regional
and national bodies increase?
Assessment Methods: Compare before and after. - Objective:
Continue to act as an information resource for the Legislative, Judicial,
and Executive branches of state government.
Assessment Strategies: Maintain positive relationships with the
Governor's Office, legislative offices, Office of the State CIO as
appropriate.
Assessment Criteria: Are relationships maintained?
Assessment Methods: Monitor meeting and communications patterns with
these entities. - Objective: Serve as a point of coordination on
IT issues that affect South Carolina higher education.
Assessment Strategies: Develop relationships with IT colleagues at
other institutions of higher education in the state.
Assessment Criteria: Are these relationships developed?
Assessment Methods: To be determined. - Objective:
Improve means of communication and ease of access to USC's eLearning
environment for students at a distance.
Assessment Strategies: Work with faculty and deans to ensure
responsiveness to curricular needs. Improve web presence for distance
education.
Assessment Criteria: Is the dialogue more frequent and focused?
Assessment Methods: Iterative meetings with Deans, faculty.
GO BACK TO TOP
- RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
The Division of Information Technology will require the
following resources to accomplish its objectives in FY
2004-05:
- Time does not permit an exact map between
objectives and resource requirements. In general, resources
are adequate to meet objectives.
|